Radiotherapy Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Radiotherapy, including details on cancer treatment, side effects. | ||||||||
|
Cost-utility analysis of short- versus long-course palliative radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.van den Hout WB, Kramer GW, Noordijk EM, Leer JW Department of Medical Decision Making, J10-S, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands. w.b.van_den_hout@lumc.nl BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy can effectively palliate the symptoms of poor-prognosis patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, controversy remains about whether short-course or more protracted radiotherapy schedules provide better value for the money. We conducted a societal cost-utility analysis of a Dutch multicenter randomized trial with 1-year follow-up that compared the efficacy of radiotherapy schedules consisting of 10 fractions of 3 Gy (10 x 3 Gy) versus two fractions of 8 Gy (2 x 8 Gy) in 297 patients with inoperable stage IIIA/B or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. this trial found that the 10 x 3-Gy group had better survival than the 2 x 8-Gy group. METHODS: Lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated using the EuroQol questionnaire. Lifetime societal costs were estimated using a model estimated based on data from cost questionnaires filled out by a subset of patients (n = 56). Differences were analyzed statistically using two-sided nonparametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Compared with the 2 x 8-Gy group, the 10 x 3-Gy group accrued statistically significantly more QALYs (20.0 versus 13.2 weeks; difference = 6.8 weeks, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.1 to 13.5 weeks, P = .05), which was mainly due to the statistically significantly better survival (38.1 versus 27.4 weeks; difference = 10.7 weeks, 95% CI = 0.9 to 20.6 weeks, P = .03) without a statistically significant difference with respect to the average valuation of health (P = .27). Total radiotherapy and radiotherapy-related costs were estimated at 5236 dollars for the 10 x 3-Gy group and 2512 dollars for the 2 x 8-Gy group (difference = 2724 dollars, 95% CI = 2501 dollars to 2947 dollars, P<.001). The 39% increase in life expectancy in the 10 x 3-Gy group as compared with the 2 x 8-Gy group was associated with a 30% increase in survival-related nonradiotherapy costs (11,254 dollars versus 8651 dollars, difference 2602 dollars, 95% CI = -357 dollars to 5562 dollars, P = .09). The cost-utility ratio for the 10 x 3-Gy schedule versus the 2 x 8-Gy schedule was estimated at 40,900 dollars per QALY (95% CI = 19,400 dollars to 1,100,000 dollars per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: In these poor-prognosis non-small-cell lung cancer patients, the estimated cost-utility ratio for the palliative 10 x 3-Gy schedule was acceptable according to current economic standards. However, the additional costs for the protracted schedule were justified not by improved quality of life but by longer survival. Published 20 December 2006 in J Natl Cancer Inst, 98(24): 1786-94.
© 2004-2008 Radiotherapy Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
